|
|
| Focus and Scope |
| Editorial Team |
| Reviewers |
| Publication Ethics |
| Peer Review Process |
| Open Access Statement |
| Plagiarism Policy |
| Author Fees |
| Copyright Notice |
| Archives Policy |
| Indexing |
| Author Guidelines |
| For Readers |
| For Authors |
| For Librarians |
Peer Review Process
he research article submitted to this online journal will be double-blind peer-reviewed (Both reviewer and author remain anonymous to each other) at least 2 (two) reviewers. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process.
For checking Plagiarism, the editorial team will screen plagiarism manually (offline and online database) on the Title, Abstract, and Body Text of the manuscript, and by using Turnitin plagiarism detection software. If it is found a plagiarism indication over 20% of plagiarism based on the result of the check, we will send back the article to the author to be revised for the plagiarised contents
Review Process:
- Editor receiving manuscript from author;
- The editor evaluates the manuscript (journal aim and scope, in house style, supplementary data); (Rejected if not meet criteria)
- Editor screening for plagiarism on offline and online database manually; (send back the article to the author to be revised for the plagiarised contents over 20%, contacted author if found redundancy or minor plagiarism for clarification)
- Editor sends the manuscript to reviewer along with review form (double-blind review, Both reviewer and author remain anonymous to each other);
- Reviewer send back the review form to Editor (with revised manuscript if necessary);
- Editor decision (rejected, require major revision, need minor revision, or accepted);
- Confirmation to the Author.
- If a revision, the author revised manuscripts and should be returned to the editor without delay. Returned later than two months will be considered as new submissions.
